Free speech org calls out vagueness of university's 'sexually suggestive' speech code

  • The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education has issued a “red light” warning to Morehead State University’s speech code.
  • The organization is concerned about the vagueness of certain clauses, especially one pertaining to pictures and artwork.

A free-speech advocacy group highlighted Morehead State University in Kentucky as having a concerning policy around policing students’ speech.

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) named Morehead as their first 2020 Speech Code of the Month, giving the school a “red light” rating in light of concerns about students’ free speech rights.

The school’s policy defines sexual harassment as including “displaying sexually suggestive objects or pictures, cartoons or posters.”   

A “red light” rating from FIRE means that at least one school policy has been found to be “clearly and substantially” restrictive of free speech. To be qualified as such, FIRE says that a policy/decision must be unquestionably infringing upon protected speech. 

[RELATED: Schreiner's 'Free Speech Policy' is anything but, FIRE warns]

In the case of Morehead, FIRE says that the university’s policy on sexual misconduct is prohibitive of full expression of free speech. 

The school’s policy defines sexual harassment as including “displaying sexually suggestive objects or pictures, cartoons or posters.” The policy also states that using “degrading words” or “making sexual gestures” are examples of sexual harassment.

In FIRE’s analysis,  the organization explains how Morehead has overstepped with this particular clause, writing, “When speech is a part of harassment, it isn’t constitutionally protected. But just because speech is sexual in nature, that doesn’t mean it constitutes harassment.”

FIRE makes the point that such a policy is vague and broad, which makes unfair application a likely outcome. Besides this, the organization finds that such a policy has a “chilling” effect on speech.

[RELATED: Texas college no longer promises ‘freedom of thought’]

Alternatively, FIRE states that this policy could be corrected. Instead of singling out suggestive posters, FIRE suggests that the policy could state that suggestive posters can be part of a pattern that translates into sexual harassment that can be “legally defined as punishable.” The organization confirms that this change to the current sexual harassment policy would be more constitutionally sound.

Campus Reform reached out to Morehead State University for comment, but the school did not respond in time for publication. 

Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @carolinefshaver



STAY INFORMED
Get exclusive access to breaking CampusReform stories as they happen. Sign up below and we'll keep you in the loop.
 Weekly Digest

 Daily Emails

Caroline Shaver
Caroline Shaver | North Carolina Campus Correspondent

Caroline Shaver is a North Carolina Campus Correspondent, reporting liberal bias and abuse on college campuses. She is a junior at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, studying Political Science. Caroline also writes for her school’s paper, The Seahawk, and is president of her chapter of TPUSA.

18 Articles by Caroline Shaver