Profs critique 'white fragility,' deny reverse racism exists
One professor insisted that "there is no such thing as 'reverse racism,'" saying the notion is simply born of "white fragility," while the other argued that "the White House" is involved in efforts to "create a white ethno-state."
Roger Williams University hosted two "antiracist scholars" on April 4 for a lecture about "Race and Power" as part of this year's annual them: "Talking About Race, Gender, and Power."
Roger Williams University hosted two “antiracist scholars” last week for a discussion of “white fragility” and “why white people perceive even minimal amounts of racial stress as unbearable.”
The April 4 event, billed as the capstone to RWU’s “Talking About Race, Gender, and Power” lecture series, featured American University professor Ibram Kendi and Dr. Robin DiAngelo, who teaches courses on “Multicultural Teaching,” “Cultural Diversity & Social Justice,” and “Anti-Racist Education” at the University of Washington-Seattle.
[RELATED: Profs claim scientific objectivity reinforces ‘whiteness’]
DiAngleo, author of the book White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard to Talk to White People About Racism, spoke to the belief that racism is expressed through power structures rather than actions.
“The dominant culture presents it as...a binary question: Only some people participate in racism and those are bad people,” she stated. “But if you understand racism as a structure, you ask different questions.”
She then cited various instances of “state-sanctioned institutional racism” in America, such as miscegenation laws, “lynching and mob violence,” “employment discrimination,” and “mass incarceration.”
Because “African-Americans are not and have never been in position to do this to white people,” DiAngelo insisted that they cannot be guilty of racism.
“There is no such thing as ‘reverse racism,’” she declared. “Racism by definition includes the weight of historical and institutional power behind it. It is a structure—not an event. It is a structure we are in, and none of us could be or have been exempt from its forces.”
[RELATED: Prof claims ‘there is no such thing as black racism’]
Kendi, who serves as the director of the Antiracist Research and Policy Center at American University, spoke in large part about the elusivity of a universally-accepted definition of racism, pointing out that everyone denies accusations of racism.
“When they are charged with racism, they typically say things like: ‘I’m the least racist person you’ve ever interviewed, I’m the least racist person you’ve ever met,’” Kendi explained. “So denial is sort of baked into the fabric of racism itself.”
According to RWU’s news release, Kendi defined racism as “any idea that suggests that a racial group is superior or inferior to another racial group in any way,” as well as any policy that produces a racially unequal outcome, noting that the assessment does not depend on intent, but rather on the quantifiable consequences.
[RELATED: Black conservative shouted down for speaking ‘against own people’]
“With every racist policy in American history, those who benefited or created those policies denied that those policies were racist,” Kendi declared during his presentation. “It’s quite easy to hide intention.”
Slave owners, he pointed out, often tried to justify slavery by claiming that “God’s law” made servitude a natural and beneficial condition for black people, while their ideological successors subsequently claimed that Jim Crow laws created “separate but equal” conditions.
He then implied that contemporary conservatives are employing the same tactics to justify their own policy priorities.
“And, of course, today those who are supporting mass-incarcerating or mass-deporting policies are denying that those policies are in any way racist,” he said. “They are denying that they are trying to create a white ethno-state—from the White House to those who are marching in places like Charlottesville—because, of course, they state there’s this huge problem that these policies are solving.”
[RELATED: OSU prof goes on anti-Republican tirade in class]
“Talking About Race, Gender, and Power” is RWU’s “annual theme” for the 2017-2018 school year, and “aims to engage the public in positive, civil discourse and the sharing of divergent viewpoints on the intersection of race, gender and power in America.”
Other events that have been held as part of the lecture series include “The Race Card and the Trump Card: New Challenges and Familiar Frustrations,” “Me Too: The Movement to Empower Survivors,” and “Not Just Race, Not Just Gender: Being a Woman of Color in the Workplace.”
In addition to the speaking events, RWU asserts that “faculty members incorporate the annual theme into courses and projects and student clubs and organizations adopt the theme into their discussions and events.”
Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @celinedryan
