Academic groups sign on for anti-Trump 'Women's March'

  • Two national academic associations have announced their participation in a “Women’s March” later this month to protest “the rhetoric of the past election cycle.”
  • While the event's organizers have not taken any explicit political positions beyond opposition to Trump, the list of official partners is filled with liberal and pro-choice groups, but not a single pro-life or conservative organization.

Two national academic associations have announced their participation in a “Women’s March” later this month to protest “the rhetoric of the past election cycle.”

The American Association of University Women (AAUW) and the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) are both listed among the official partners of the Women’s March on Washington D.C., which is expected to convene more than 200,000 women from across the United States on January 21, the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration.

“The rhetoric of the past election cycle has insulted, demonized, and threatened many of us.”   

[RELATED: Socialist students plan national Inauguration Day walkout]

“The rhetoric of the past election cycle has insulted, demonized, and threatened many of us—immigrants of all statuses, Muslims and those of diverse religious faiths, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, survivors of sexual assault—and our communities are hurting and scared,” the event’s mission statement begins.

“In the spirit of democracy and honoring the champions of human rights, dignity, and justice who have come before us, we join in diversity to show our presence in numbers too great to ignore,” the statement continues, predicting that “the Women’s March on Washington will send a bold message to our new government on their first day in office, and to the world that women's rights are human rights.”

One of the “women’s rights” likely to be promoted during the march is the right for women to choose an abortion, because while the event organizers have refrained from taking explicit positions on abortion or any other specific political issues, many of the march’s official partners are pro-choice organizations, including Planned Parenthood, #VoteProChoice, Catholics for Choice, The National Abortion Federation, and Planned Parenthood.

The National Women’s Liberation group, for example, calls for “all women and girls, trans* and nonbinary folk” to protest the alleged “anti-women agenda” of the Trump administration on the weekend of of the march.

Another partner is the Center for Reproductive Rights, which issued a press release deeming the march a good way to “show support for a broad range of issues, including women’s access to safe and legal abortion.”

[RELATED: GW prof gives extra credit for attending pro-abortion, pro-Dem event]

One position that all of the participants, partners, and organizers seem to share is broad opposition to Donald Trump, who is not mentioned by name but is repeatedly referenced in the context of the group’s concerns about the policies they expect the “new government” to pursue.

The Lady Parts League, an organization dedicated to promoting access to abortion and an official partner of the march, has also tweeted a message urging supporters to oppose Sen. Jeff Sessions’ nomination for Attorney General, and the group’s website speaks of the “dark forces” of the “Trump administration.”

The Women’s March has no official pro-life partners, nor have any explicitly conservative groups signed on to participate.

While the AAUW considers itself a “nonpartisan” nonprofit, it is encouraging its members to attend the Women’s March, providing a number of sample Tweets for promoting the Women’s March on its website, including “Women’s rights are human rights!” and “ We want #equalpay #paidleave #minimumwage raise, & more!

[RELATED: GW Dems plot their ‘resistance’ to Trump administration]

The AAUP, a membership organization for academics, has not mentioned its affiliation with the march on its website, but does indicate support for the “Campus Sanctuary Movement” and other liberal causes, and a blog post on the site also laments legislative restrictions that have “deprived women in large sections of the country of access to abortion clinics.”

Neither the AAUP nor the AAUW responded to inquiries from Campus Reform in time for publication.

Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @Toni_Airaksinen

Get exclusive access to breaking CampusReform stories as they happen. Sign up below and we'll keep you in the loop.
 Weekly Digest

 Daily Emails

Toni Airaksinen
Toni Airaksinen | Columnist at PJ Media

Toni Airaksinen is Columnist at PJ Media and a Consultant at Youth Radio. She was previously a New Jersey Campus Correspondent, reporting on liberal bias and abuse for Campus Reform with a focus on Title IX, the OCR, and the First Amendment. During college, she also was a columnist for Quillette and The Columbia Spectator. Her exclusives have been featured on FOX News and The Drudge Report. She graduated from Barnard College in 2018.

20 Articles by Toni Airaksinen